pajiba.com;"Kerry is leading Bush in national polls of the swing states. Because our choice is either George W. Bush or John F. Kerry. If after the election Kerry is president but the Republicans control the House and Senate we can stop him from getting anybody on the Supreme Court, we won't let him raise taxes. No part of the Republican coalition would be damaged or destroyed by a Kerry victory. But with another four years of Bush, labor unions will decline further. We'll get tort reform, which will cost the trial lawyers millions and millions. We'll be reducing government employment, which will hurt the public employees unions. There's no opportunity for a united Democratic government. There is an opportunity for a united Republican government. Indeed the Democratic Party does have more to lose than the Republican Party, but the real losers are United States citizens. If the Republicans control Congress, what sort of person might George W. Bush appoint to the Supreme Court? Because he would surely be only more arrogant in his governance during a second term, one can assume any Bush nominee would have little respect for separation of church and state,and would probably even be willing to grant the executive all-inclusive powers during this never-ending war, thereby destroying the balance of power so carefully created by our founding fathers.And though many voters place environmental policy low on their lists of priorities, the future of the earth's ability to sustain life is also something we ought to think about. Another recent piece from the New York Review of Books outlines a report that was prepared by two energy consultants, one of them the former head of planning for Royal Dutch/Shell. The scenario laid out in the report is of a world changed by the greenhouse effect. A flooding of the Atlantic by the melting of Artic ice would effectively destroy the climate-controlling Gulf Stream by 2010. With this, eastern North America and western Europe would become drastically cooler while the rest of the world would continue to grow warmer.
This would lead directly to a shortage of grain. The report predicts this would in turn lead to war over a desperate need for natural resources. Since the Environmental Protection Agency under George W. Bush dropped the chapter on greenhouse gas emissions from its air quality report in 2002, and since he rejected the Kyoto Protocol, which would have curbed the United States, emission of greenhouse gases, one must assume that the current president cares little for the potential threat to national security that global warming will one day present. Considering all this, one thought is unavoidable: while John F. Kerry isn't as lively as we might wish, neither is he as deadly as George W. Bush."
This would lead directly to a shortage of grain. The report predicts this would in turn lead to war over a desperate need for natural resources. Since the Environmental Protection Agency under George W. Bush dropped the chapter on greenhouse gas emissions from its air quality report in 2002, and since he rejected the Kyoto Protocol, which would have curbed the United States, emission of greenhouse gases, one must assume that the current president cares little for the potential threat to national security that global warming will one day present. Considering all this, one thought is unavoidable: while John F. Kerry isn't as lively as we might wish, neither is he as deadly as George W. Bush."
Here's something for everyone to chew-on If you think George Bush is the man to be our President, then you better read this again. It scares the heck out of me to think this may be what my next your years may become, and I darn sure am not going to let this happen. If my Vote counts for anything then I hope its the one vote!! That keeps Bush out of office............
